If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone. They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby. The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. https://fnote.me/notes/2WBTzs are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer. Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is. While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were far from antennas. But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue). http://eggrocket6.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/34069019-are-usually-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-tower-system?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards. Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
https://fnote.me/notes/2WBTzs|what is a safe distance from a cell tower|http://eggrocket6.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/34069019-are-usually-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-tower-system?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog|what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower
